Seahawks vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The seahawks vs washington commanders match player stats tell the story of a wild NFL game decided by turnovers and late scoring. Washington beat Seattle 33–31 on September 27, 2026, at Northwest Stadium, despite gaining far fewer passing yards and allowing four touchdown passes.

Sam Darnold led Seattle’s passing attack with 379 yards and four touchdowns. Jaxon Smith-Njigba caught 10 passes for 128 yards and two touchdowns, giving Seattle one of the game’s best individual performances. Marcus Mariota answered with three touchdown passes and no interceptions for Washington, while the Commanders defense delivered the decisive play with a 50 yard interception return for a touchdown.

Seattle moved the ball effectively but could not protect possession. Washington made better use of its opportunities, stayed composed late in the game, and held on for a two point win.

Seahawks vs Commanders Final Score

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Seattle Seahawks	0	10	7	14	31
Washington Commanders	7	10	7	9	33

Final result: Washington Commanders 33, Seattle Seahawks 31

Date: September 27, 2026

Venue: Northwest Stadium, Landover, Maryland

Washington scored first and built a 17 to 10 halftime lead. Seattle kept pace after halftime, and the teams were tied at 24 late in the fourth quarter. The Commanders then kicked a field goal and returned an interception for a touchdown to create a lead they could protect.

Seattle scored again before the final whistle, but the comeback stopped short.

Sam Darnold Player Stats

Sam Darnold delivered a high volume passing performance for Seattle. He completed 31 of 45 attempts for 379 yards and four touchdowns. He also threw two interceptions.

Passing stat	Sam Darnold
Completions	31
Attempts	45
Completion rate	68.9%
Passing yards	379
Passing touchdowns	4
Interceptions	2

Darnold completed nearly seven out of every 10 passes and consistently moved the Seahawks downfield. His four touchdown passes kept Seattle in the contest and gave the offense enough scoring power to overcome several difficult stretches.

The problem was the turnovers. Both interceptions gave Washington valuable opportunities, and one became the biggest play of the game. In a close matchup, those mistakes mattered more than Darnold’s impressive yardage total.

His numbers show how a quarterback can produce a strong statistical performance without securing the win. Darnold was productive through the air, but Seattle needed cleaner decisions in key moments.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba Leads Seattle Receivers

Jaxon Smith-Njigba was Seattle’s leading receiver and one of the game’s standout players. He caught 10 passes on 14 targets for 128 yards and two touchdowns.

Receiving stat	Jaxon Smith-Njigba
Receptions	10
Targets	14
Receiving yards	128
Average yards per catch	12.8
Receiving touchdowns	2

Smith-Njigba gave Darnold a dependable target throughout the game. His 10 receptions helped Seattle sustain drives, and his two touchdown catches turned passing yards into points.

His first touchdown came on a short pass near the goal line. He added another score in the fourth quarter, helping Seattle draw level at 24. His production was a major reason the Seahawks remained within striking distance.

The numbers also highlight his role in Seattle’s passing offense. He was targeted frequently and accounted for a substantial share of the team’s receiving production. Even with Washington applying pressure at important moments, Smith-Njigba found ways to get open and gain yards after the catch.

Seahawks Receiving Stats

Seattle spread the ball among several targets, but Smith-Njigba was the clear leader. Tight end AJ Barner contributed five catches for 69 yards, while George Holani added five receptions for 48 yards.

Player	Receptions	Receiving yards	Touchdowns
Jaxon Smith-Njigba	10	128	2
AJ Barner	5	69	0
George Holani	5	48	0
Tory Horton	3	48	0
Cooper Kupp	4	46	1
Brady Russell	1	20	0
Rashid Shaheed	2	14	0
Eric Saubert	1	13	1
Jadarian Price	1	7	0

Cooper Kupp made an important contribution with four catches for 46 yards and a touchdown. Eric Saubert added a touchdown catch of his own, while Barner provided another reliable option in the middle of the field.

Tory Horton and George Holani also helped Seattle spread the workload. That variety made it harder for Washington to focus on one receiver throughout the game.

However, Seattle’s receiving production did not erase the impact of its turnovers. The Seahawks had enough explosive plays to win, but their offensive mistakes gave Washington a route to victory.

Marcus Mariota Player Stats

Marcus Mariota put together an efficient performance for Washington. He completed 19 of 31 passes for 183 yards and three touchdowns, without throwing an interception.

Passing stat	Marcus Mariota
Completions	19
Attempts	31
Completion rate	61.3%
Passing yards	183
Passing touchdowns	3
Interceptions	0

Mariota’s passing yardage was much lower than Darnold’s, but he made his opportunities count. His three touchdown passes helped Washington build its lead and answer Seattle’s scoring drives.

He connected with Rachaad White for the opening touchdown, found Treylon Burks for another score, and hit Terry McLaurin on a 30 yard touchdown pass in the third quarter.

The biggest difference between the quarterbacks was ball security. Darnold threw two interceptions, while Mariota finished without one. That gap became especially important late in the game when Washington’s defense turned an interception into a touchdown.

Mariota did not need to match Seattle’s passing volume. Washington paired his touchdown passes with enough rushing production and a game changing defensive play to finish ahead.

Terry McLaurin and Washington Receiving Stats

Terry McLaurin led Washington’s receiving group with six catches for 77 yards and a touchdown. His third quarter score helped the Commanders maintain control after Seattle had started to build momentum.

Player	Receptions	Receiving yards	Touchdowns
Terry McLaurin	6	77	1
Stefon Diggs	4	33	0
Jaylin Lane	1	21	0
Antonio Williams	2	15	0
Treylon Burks	2	13	1
John Bates	1	9	0
Jacory Croskey-Merritt	1	7	0
Rachaad White	1	6	1
Colson Yankoff	1	2	0

McLaurin was Washington’s most productive receiver by yardage. His touchdown also came at a key point in the game, giving the Commanders a cushion when Seattle was threatening to take control.

Burks made the most of his limited opportunities, catching two passes for 13 yards and a touchdown. White added a receiving score on a short pass, showing how Washington used its running backs near the goal line.

Stefon Diggs contributed four catches for 33 yards. The receiving totals were modest compared with Seattle’s numbers, but Washington found the end zone through several different players.

Seahawks Rushing Stats

Seattle’s rushing game struggled to create consistent production. The team finished with just 44 rushing yards, leaving much of the offensive workload to Darnold and the passing attack.

Player	Carries	Rushing yards	Average	Rushing TD
Jadarian Price	5	15	3.0	0
Emanuel Wilson	9	14	1.6	0
George Holani	3	10	3.3	0
Sam Darnold	1	5	5.0	0

No Seattle runner reached 20 rushing yards. Wilson had the most carries, but his 14 yards showed how difficult it was for the Seahawks to establish a dependable ground attack.

That lack of balance put more pressure on Darnold to make plays through the air. Seattle still gained 393 passing yards, but a more effective rushing game could have helped the offense control the clock and reduce its dependence on high risk throws.

Holani also contributed as a receiver, making his overall role more valuable than his rushing line alone suggests. Still, Seattle’s limited ground production was a clear weakness in the box score.

Washington Commanders Rushing Stats

Washington’s running game was not dominant, but it provided a useful complement to Mariota’s passing.

Player	Carries	Rushing yards	Average	Rushing TD
Jacory Croskey-Merritt	19	36	1.9	0
Rachaad White	8	35	4.4	0
Marcus Mariota	5	11	2.2	0

Croskey-Merritt handled the largest rushing workload with 19 carries. His average was low, but those attempts helped Washington maintain a ground presence and avoid relying entirely on the passing game.

White was more efficient on a per carry basis, gaining 35 yards on eight attempts. Mariota added 11 rushing yards on five carries.

Washington’s 82 rushing yards exceeded Seattle’s 44. That advantage helped the Commanders balance their offense and contributed to a team performance that did not require Mariota to throw for 300 yards.

The Defensive Play That Changed the Game

Washington’s defense produced the game’s most decisive moment when Kain Medrano intercepted Darnold and returned the ball 50 yards for a touchdown in the fourth quarter.

The play came after Washington had taken a 27 to 24 lead with a field goal. Instead of giving Seattle another chance to answer with a touchdown, the interception return pushed the Commanders ahead by a much larger margin.

The extra point attempt failed, but the touchdown still created a nine point lead at 33 to 24. Seattle scored again, making the final margin two points, but Washington held on.

The defensive touchdown mattered because Seattle had moved the ball well for much of the game. Washington did not need to shut down the passing attack completely. It needed one major play at the right moment, and Medrano supplied it.

Washington also finished with two interceptions and a recovered fumble, while Seattle did not record an interception. The turnover difference was one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

Team Stats Comparison

Team stat	Seattle Seahawks	Washington Commanders
Passing yards	393	183
Rushing yards	44	82
First downs	28	17
Total plays	64	65
Yards per play	6.8	4.0
Time of possession	28:32	31:28
Turnovers	3	0
Penalties	8	9
Penalty yards	53	57

Seattle had the clear edge in passing production, first downs, and yards per play. The Seahawks were able to move the ball and generate scoring chances, but they gave it away three times.

Washington’s biggest advantage was ball security. The Commanders finished with no turnovers and converted Seattle’s mistakes into a game changing defensive score. They also held the ball for almost three minutes longer.

These numbers explain why the result was not simply a matter of total yardage. Seattle moved the ball more efficiently, but Washington protected possession and made the key defensive play.

Key Scoring Plays

The scoring sequence shows how the lead shifted throughout the afternoon.

1. Washington opens the scoring: Mariota connects with Rachaad White for a six yard touchdown pass.
2. Seattle responds: Darnold finds Smith-Njigba for a one yard touchdown.
3. Washington moves ahead: Mariota throws an 11 yard touchdown to Burks.
4. Seattle adds a field goal: Jason Myers makes a 57 yard kick.
5. Washington extends the lead: Drew Stevens makes a 57 yard field goal before halftime.
6. McLaurin scores: Mariota throws a 30 yard touchdown to give Washington a 24 to 10 lead.
7. Seattle rallies: Saubert catches a touchdown pass, and Smith-Njigba scores again in the fourth quarter to tie the game at 24.
8. Washington takes the lead: Stevens makes a 36 yard field goal.
9. Medrano returns an interception: The defensive touchdown gives Washington a 33 to 24 advantage.
10. Kupp scores late: Seattle cuts the margin to two points, but Washington holds on.

The final sequence highlights the fine margin between a win and a loss. Seattle had the offensive talent to recover, but the interception return made the comeback much harder.

What the Player Stats Tell Us

The seahawks vs washington commanders match player stats reveal three main reasons Washington won.

First, Seattle’s passing game was productive. Darnold threw for 379 yards and four touchdowns, while Smith-Njigba topped 100 receiving yards and scored twice. Those are strong numbers for a road offense.

Second, Washington protected the football. Mariota threw three touchdown passes without an interception, and the Commanders did not lose possession through a turnover. That clean performance gave the defense and special teams a better chance to control the closing stages.

Third, Washington’s defense made its biggest play at the right time. Medrano’s interception return turned a narrow lead into a more comfortable advantage. Seattle scored again, but there was not enough time to complete the comeback.

The rushing numbers also mattered. Washington gained 82 yards on the ground compared with Seattle’s 44. Neither team dominated the running game, but the Commanders had the better total and a more balanced offensive approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Seahawks vs Washington Commanders game?

The Washington Commanders won 33–31 on September 27, 2026, at Northwest Stadium.

How many passing yards did Sam Darnold have?

Sam Darnold threw for 379 yards, completing 31 of 45 passes with four touchdowns and two interceptions.

How many touchdowns did Jaxon Smith-Njigba score?

Smith-Njigba caught two touchdown passes and finished with 10 receptions for 128 yards.

How did Marcus Mariota perform?

Mariota completed 19 of 31 passes for 183 yards and three touchdowns. He did not throw an interception.

Who led Washington in receiving yards?

Terry McLaurin led Washington with 77 receiving yards on six catches and scored one touchdown.

What was the biggest turning point?

Kain Medrano’s 50 yard interception return for a touchdown in the fourth quarter gave Washington a decisive lead.

Which team had more rushing yards?

Washington had 82 rushing yards, while Seattle finished with 44.

Why did Seattle lose despite gaining more passing yards?

Seattle threw two interceptions and committed three total turnovers. Washington committed none, and one interception became a defensive touchdown.

Final Takeaway

The seahawks vs washington commanders match player stats show a game where Seattle won the passing battle but Washington won the turnover battle. Darnold and Smith-Njigba delivered major offensive performances, yet the Seahawks could not avoid costly mistakes.

Mariota’s three touchdown passes and Medrano’s interception return helped Washington turn a close contest into a 33–31 victory. For Seattle, the lesson was clear: big passing numbers matter, but protecting the football is essential in tight NFL games.