The los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats tell the story of a thrilling NFL playoff game that ended with a 20 to 17 Rams victory in overtime on January 18, 2026. Los Angeles survived a late Chicago comeback at Soldier Field and advanced to the NFC Championship Game after Harrison Mevis kicked the winning 42 yard field goal.
Matthew Stafford led the Rams’ passing attack, Kyren Williams scored two rushing touchdowns, and cornerback Cobie Durant recorded two interceptions. Chicago quarterback Caleb Williams threw for 257 yards and two touchdowns, but his three interceptions proved costly in a game decided by small margins. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn334482search4″,”turn902616view1”]}/>
This complete game recap covers the final score, passing statistics, rushing leaders, receiving performances, defensive highlights, quarter by quarter scoring, and the key plays that decided the result.
Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears Match Summary
The NFC Divisional Round matchup brought two productive offenses together in cold, snowy conditions in Chicago. The Bears moved the ball effectively for long stretches, but the Rams made the most of their defensive opportunities and delivered the decisive kick in overtime.
<text color=”secondary” size=”sm”>Game details</text>
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Game | NFC Divisional Round |
| Date | January 18, 2026 |
| Venue | Soldier Field, Chicago, Illinois |
| Final score | Rams 20, Bears 17 |
| Result | Rams won in overtime |
| Winning kicker | Harrison Mevis |
| Game winning kick | 42 yard field goal |
| Attendance | 60,253 |
The Rams entered the game with a chance to reach the conference championship. Chicago had home field advantage and an offense capable of producing explosive plays. The result came down to turnovers, red zone execution, and a few crucial defensive stops.
Los Angeles finished with 340 total yards, while Chicago gained 417. Despite that yardage advantage, the Bears could not turn enough of their opportunities into points. Three interceptions by Caleb Williams gave the Rams a major advantage in a contest with a narrow final margin. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search3″,”turn334482search4”]}/>
Final Score by Quarter
The game developed into a defensive contest after a competitive first half. Neither team scored in the third quarter, and both offenses produced touchdowns late in regulation to send the matchup into overtime.
| Quarter | Los Angeles Rams | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| First | 7 | 0 |
| Second | 3 | 10 |
| Third | 0 | 0 |
| Fourth | 7 | 7 |
| Overtime | 3 | 0 |
| Final | 20 | 17 |
Los Angeles opened the scoring with a short touchdown run from Kyren Williams. Chicago responded in the second quarter with a touchdown pass from Caleb Williams to D.J. Moore and a 48 yard field goal by Cairo Santos.
The Rams tied the game at 10 just before halftime with a 32 yard field goal from Mevis. After a scoreless third quarter, Kyren Williams scored again to give Los Angeles a 17 to 10 lead.
Chicago appeared to be running out of time, but Caleb Williams connected with Cole Kmet for a 14 yard touchdown with 18 seconds remaining. The extra point tied the score at 17.
In overtime, Kamren Curl intercepted Caleb Williams, giving the Rams another opportunity. Mevis then converted a 42 yard field goal to secure the 20 to 17 win. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn902616view1”]}/>
Rams Passing Stats
Matthew Stafford handled the Rams’ passing game against a Bears defense that created pressure throughout the contest. His numbers were not spectacular, but he avoided interceptions and helped Los Angeles move the ball when it mattered.
| Statistic | Matthew Stafford |
|---|---|
| Completions | 20 |
| Pass attempts | 42 |
| Completion percentage | 47.6% |
| Passing yards | 258 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 |
| Sacks taken | 4 |
| Yards lost on sacks | 29 |
| Longest completion | 35 yards |
| Passer rating | 67.4 |
Stafford completed 20 of his 42 passes for 258 yards. He did not throw a touchdown or an interception, but four sacks limited the offense’s efficiency.
His completion rate was lower than usual for a quarterback expected to lead a playoff offense. Chicago’s pass rush and the difficult weather conditions made consistent passing harder, especially during the middle stages of the game.
Stafford’s value showed up in the late stages. Rather than forcing risky throws, he continued working with his receivers and helped the Rams move into field goal range in overtime.
His connection with Puka Nacua was particularly important. The receiver provided a dependable option across the field, while Colby Parkinson produced several important catches. Stafford also found Davante Adams on key late downs.
The Rams did not need a high scoring passing performance to win. Their defense created turnovers, and their running game supplied both touchdowns. Stafford’s ball security helped preserve the team’s chances until the winning drive. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn334482search12”]}/>
Bears Passing Stats
Caleb Williams produced 257 passing yards and two touchdowns, giving Chicago enough offensive production to remain competitive. However, his three interceptions made the difference in a close playoff game.
| Statistic | Caleb Williams |
|---|---|
| Completions | 23 |
| Pass attempts | 42 |
| Completion percentage | 54.8% |
| Passing yards | 257 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions thrown | 3 |
| Sacks taken | 0 |
| Longest completion | 34 yards |
| Passer rating | 59.3 |
Williams completed 23 of 42 attempts. His two touchdown passes went to Moore and Kmet, including the late fourth quarter score that forced overtime.
The quarterback also made plays with his legs, finishing with five carries for 40 yards. His mobility helped Chicago convert difficult situations and extend several drives.
However, the turnovers outweighed much of that production. The Rams intercepted Williams three times, and the defense turned those takeaways into 10 points. Cobie Durant recorded two interceptions, while Kam Curl made the crucial interception in overtime.
Chicago also struggled to finish some promising drives. A missed opportunity near the goal line and failed fourth down attempts reduced the value of its yardage advantage.
Williams showed playmaking ability under pressure, particularly on the dramatic touchdown to Kmet. Still, his decision making in critical situations left Chicago short of a conference championship appearance. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn902616view1”]}/>
Rams Rushing Stats
Kyren Williams was one of the biggest reasons Los Angeles advanced. The running back scored both Rams touchdowns and delivered consistent production on the ground.
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyren Williams | 21 | 87 | 4.1 | 2 |
| Blake Corum | 6 | 19 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Puka Nacua | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Jordan Whittington | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Matthew Stafford | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 31 | 111 | 3.6 | 2 |
Williams finished with 87 rushing yards on 21 carries. His two touchdowns came on runs of four and five yards, giving Los Angeles the scoring advantage it needed.
Blake Corum added 19 yards on six attempts, while Nacua contributed six rushing yards. The Rams’ ground game did not produce many explosive runs, but it became increasingly important late in the contest.
Los Angeles leaned on its running backs in the fourth quarter and overtime. That approach helped the offense settle down after Stafford struggled to find consistent passing rhythm in the middle of the game.
The Rams’ two rushing touchdowns also showed their ability to finish drives near the goal line. Instead of depending on difficult throws in poor conditions, they used their running game to gain the yards that mattered most.
Williams’ combination of rushing production and touchdown scoring made him the leading offensive contributor for Los Angeles. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn334482search12”]}/>
Bears Rushing Stats
Chicago gained more rushing yards than Los Angeles, but its ground game did not produce a touchdown. D’Andre Swift led the Bears in rushing attempts and yards, while Kyle Monangai provided additional carries.
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D’Andre Swift | 19 | 76 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 13 | 36 | 2.8 | 0 |
| Caleb Williams | 5 | 40 | 8.0 | 0 |
| D.J. Moore | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Luther Burden | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 39 | 160 | 4.1 | 0 |
Swift recorded 76 yards on 19 carries. His workload helped Chicago control possession and gain first downs, but the Rams made several important stops in short yardage situations.
Monangai added 36 yards on 13 carries. Although he produced a 15 yard run, he struggled to find consistent room against the Rams’ defensive front.
Williams’ 40 rushing yards were another important part of Chicago’s offense. His ability to escape pressure and gain yards gave the Bears another way to move the chains.
Chicago finished with 160 rushing yards, compared with 111 for Los Angeles. That difference illustrates why total yardage alone cannot explain the outcome. The Bears gained more ground, but they failed to convert enough opportunities into points and gave away possession through interceptions. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search3″,”turn334482search4”]}/>
Rams Receiving Stats
The Rams spread their passing production across several players. Puka Nacua and Colby Parkinson each finished with 56 receiving yards, while Jordan Whittington and Tyler Higbee added useful contributions.
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puka Nacua | 10 | 5 | 56 | 0 |
| Colby Parkinson | 7 | 3 | 56 | 0 |
| Jordan Whittington | 2 | 2 | 35 | 0 |
| Kyren Williams | 5 | 4 | 30 | 0 |
| Tyler Higbee | 2 | 1 | 27 | 0 |
| Davante Adams | 6 | 2 | 24 | 0 |
| Terrance Ferguson | 5 | 1 | 19 | 0 |
| Konata Mumpfield | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
Nacua was Stafford’s most targeted receiver, drawing 10 targets and making five catches. His 56 yards helped the Rams sustain drives, and his contribution on a key fourth down during the scoring drive in the fourth quarter was particularly valuable.
Parkinson also gained 56 yards on three receptions. His average of 18.7 yards per catch gave Los Angeles a useful downfield option.
Whittington caught both of his targets for 35 yards. Higbee made one catch for 27 yards, while Adams finished with two receptions for 24 yards.
No Rams receiver scored a touchdown. The team’s offensive touchdowns came through Kyren Williams on the ground, showing how the passing and rushing attacks served different purposes.
The receiving numbers also highlight an important detail about the game. Stafford did not have one dominant receiving performance to carry the offense. Instead, several players made contributions, and the running game handled the most important scoring work. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn334482search12”]}/>
Bears Receiving Stats
Chicago’s receiving group helped the offense gain 257 passing yards. D.J. Moore and Cole Kmet scored touchdowns, while Colston Loveland led the team in receiving yards alongside Moore’s productive performance.
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D.J. Moore | 8 | 5 | 52 | 1 |
| Colston Loveland | 10 | 4 | 56 | 0 |
| Rome Odunze | 6 | 2 | 44 | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 3 | 3 | 31 | 1 |
| Luther Burden | 7 | 3 | 24 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Durham Smythe | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Moore finished with five catches for 52 yards and a touchdown. His three yard reception from Caleb Williams tied the game at seven in the second quarter.
Kmet caught all three of his targets for 31 yards and a touchdown. His 14 yard reception in the closing seconds of regulation was the play that sent the game into overtime.
Loveland made four catches for 56 yards on 10 targets, matching the team high in receiving yards. Odunze added 44 yards on two receptions, while Burden caught three passes for 24 yards.
Chicago had enough receiving production to keep the Rams’ defense busy. The problem was not a complete lack of passing success. It was the inability to protect that success from costly turnovers and failed scoring opportunities.
The Bears needed one more clean possession in overtime. Instead, Williams threw his third interception, and Los Angeles capitalized. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn334482search12”]}/>
Defensive Player Stats and Key Plays
Defense played a major role in the Rams’ victory. The most important contributions came from players who disrupted Chicago’s possessions and created opportunities for the offense.
Cobie Durant
Durant recorded two interceptions and two tackles. His takeaways were crucial because they stopped Bears drives and gave the Rams additional possessions.
The two interceptions also made Durant one of the most influential defensive players in the game. Chicago’s offense had gained substantial yardage, but it could not maintain possession consistently.
Kamren Curl
Curl intercepted Caleb Williams in overtime. That turnover gave the Rams the ball back after the Bears had an opportunity to move toward scoring range.
The interception was the turning point of overtime. Los Angeles then advanced far enough for Mevis to attempt the game winning field goal.
Jared Verse
Verse generated six quarterback pressures, according to NFL Next Gen Stats. His pressure disrupted the passing game and contributed to the defensive effort that kept Chicago from controlling the game late.
Quentin Lake
Lake delivered an important hit on Swift before a fourth down stop near the goal line. The play helped the Rams prevent Chicago from scoring during a critical fourth quarter possession.
The defensive performance was not perfect. Los Angeles missed tackles early and allowed the Bears to gain more total yards. However, the unit made key stops when the outcome was at stake.
Chicago’s defense also kept the game close for much of the night, limiting the Rams to 20 points. Yet the Bears could not overcome their offensive turnovers. <Cite refs={[“turn902616view1″,”turn334482search4”]}/>
Team Stats Comparison
The overall numbers show why the game remained competitive despite the three point final margin.
| Statistic | Rams | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Total yards | 340 | 417 |
| Passing yards | 258 gross | 257 |
| Net passing yards | 229 | 257 |
| Rushing yards | 111 | 160 |
| Total plays | 77 | 81 |
| Yards per play | 4.4 | 5.1 |
| First downs | 22 | 23 |
| Third down conversions | 5 of 16 | 9 of 19 |
| Fourth down conversions | 1 of 1 | 3 of 6 |
| Time of possession | 32:26 | 39:15 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 3 |
| Sacks allowed | 4 | 0 |
Chicago led in total yards, rushing yards, first downs, third down conversions, and time of possession. The Bears also averaged more yards per play.
However, Los Angeles won the turnover battle. The Rams threw no interceptions, while Chicago threw three. Those mistakes were especially costly because they gave the Rams extra chances to score.
The Rams also held Chicago to no rushing touchdowns. Their ability to stop short yardage plays forced the Bears to rely on passing in several important situations.
The difference between net and gross passing yards is important here. Stafford threw for 258 yards but lost 29 yards on sacks, leaving the Rams with 229 net passing yards. Chicago allowed no sacks in the official box score and finished with 257 net passing yards.
The statistical picture is clear: Chicago moved the ball more effectively overall, but Los Angeles was more careful with possession and made the decisive defensive plays. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search3″,”turn334482search4”]}/>
Biggest Turning Points of the Game
Kyren Williams Opens the Scoring
Williams scored on a four yard run in the first quarter. The touchdown gave Los Angeles an early lead and established the running game as an important part of its plan.
Chicago Takes a 10 to 7 Lead
Moore’s touchdown catch tied the game, and Santos later kicked a 48 yard field goal to put Chicago ahead. The Bears had begun to build momentum before Mevis tied the score just before halftime.
The Rams Score Again in the Fourth Quarter
Kyren Williams’ second rushing touchdown gave Los Angeles a 17 to 10 lead. The Rams relied more heavily on the ground game late, and the approach helped them control important possessions.
Cole Kmet Forces Overtime
Chicago faced a fourth down situation late in regulation. Caleb Williams escaped pressure and connected with Kmet for a 14 yard touchdown with 18 seconds left.
The dramatic play tied the score at 17 and gave Chicago another chance to win at home.
Curl and Mevis Finish the Job
In overtime, Curl intercepted Williams to end a Bears possession. Stafford and the Rams offense then moved into field goal range, allowing Mevis to make the 42 yard kick that sealed the victory.
The sequence showed how a single defensive play can change a playoff game. Chicago had enough yardage to compete, but its final turnover gave Los Angeles the opening it needed. <Cite refs={[“turn334482search0″,”turn902616view1”]}/>
What the Player Stats Tell Us
The box score offers several useful lessons for NFL fans.
First, rushing touchdowns can matter more than raw passing totals. Stafford threw for 258 yards without a touchdown, yet the Rams scored twice on the ground and won the game.
Second, turnovers can outweigh an advantage in possession and yardage. Chicago held the ball for nearly seven more minutes and gained 77 more total yards, but its three interceptions proved too costly.
Third, a strong performance is not always reflected in one statistic. Nacua’s receiving totals were solid, but his role in a key fourth down conversion helped the Rams continue a drive. Durant’s two interceptions were more valuable than a high tackle total might have been in the same situation.
Finally, late game execution separates playoff winners from teams that fall short. Chicago produced a memorable touchdown to force overtime, but Los Angeles responded with a defensive takeaway and a successful field goal.
These details explain why the game was more than a simple comparison of passing and rushing yards. Situational football, ball security, and defensive decisions shaped the final result.
Final Verdict
The los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats show that Los Angeles won through timely defense, efficient ball security, and Kyren Williams’ two rushing touchdowns. Stafford passed for 258 yards without an interception, while Mevis delivered the decisive 42 yard field goal in overtime.
Chicago had the statistical advantage in total yards and time of possession. Caleb Williams threw for 257 yards and two touchdowns, and both Moore and Kmet found the end zone. However, his three interceptions prevented the Bears from turning their offensive production into a win.
The Rams advanced with a 20 to 17 victory, while Chicago’s playoff run ended despite a strong late comeback. For fans reviewing the box score, the central takeaway is straightforward: yardage matters, but turnovers and execution in key moments often decide the biggest NFL games.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Rams vs Bears game on January 18, 2026?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Chicago Bears 20 to 17 in overtime in the NFC Divisional Round at Soldier Field.
How many passing yards did Matthew Stafford have?
Matthew Stafford threw for 258 yards on 20 completions in 42 attempts. He recorded no passing touchdowns and no interceptions.
What were Caleb Williams’ stats against the Rams?
Caleb Williams completed 23 of 42 passes for 257 yards and two touchdowns. He threw three interceptions and added 40 rushing yards on five carries.
How many touchdowns did Kyren Williams score?
Kyren Williams scored two rushing touchdowns. He finished with 87 rushing yards on 21 carries and added four receptions for 30 receiving yards.
Who scored the winning points?
Rams kicker Harrison Mevis made a 42 yard field goal in overtime to give Los Angeles the 20 to 17 victory.
How many interceptions did the Rams record?
The Rams recorded three interceptions. Cobie Durant made two, and Kamren Curl recorded the decisive overtime interception.
Which team had more total yards?
Chicago gained 417 total yards, compared with 340 for Los Angeles. Despite that advantage, the Bears lost after throwing three interceptions.
How did the Rams reach the NFC Championship Game?
Los Angeles defeated Chicago 20 to 17 in overtime. The Rams forced a turnover in overtime and then drove into field goal range for Mevis’ winning kick.
Max has a knack for spotting the funny side of life and turning it into clever puns. A self-proclaimed joke collector, he spends his free time reading comics, playing word games, and making anyone around him crack a smile.