Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats and Game Recap 2026

Photo of author
Written By Logan Carter

The thunder vs spurs match player stats tell the story of a strong Oklahoma City start, a determined San Antonio comeback attempt, and a timely scoring response from the Thunder. Oklahoma City defeated the Spurs 116 to 104 on October 20, 2026, at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio. Shai Gilgeous Alexander led all scorers with 32 points, while Stephon Castle paced the Spurs with 24 points. Jared McCain added 20 points off the bench to give Oklahoma City another major scoring option. The Thunder built a 21 point halftime advantage and held on after San Antonio made a third quarter push. NBA official game recap

Thunder vs Spurs Game Summary

Oklahoma City earned a 12 point road victory by combining efficient shooting with a productive bench performance. The Thunder finished with 116 points on 45.3 percent shooting from the field and made 14 of 31 three point attempts. San Antonio scored 104 points, shot 38.7 percent from the floor, and converted 10 of 37 attempts from beyond the arc.

The Spurs did several things well. They scored 48 points in the paint, produced 31 fast break points, and shot 88 percent from the free throw line. However, their long range shooting made it difficult to overcome Oklahoma City’s early lead.

Final Score

TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Oklahoma City Thunder34312823116
San Antonio Spurs28163624104

Oklahoma City won the first half 65 to 44. San Antonio responded by winning the third quarter 36 to 28, but the Thunder entered the final period with a 93 to 80 lead. The Spurs could not close the remaining gap.

The final margin was 12 points, but the game had several different phases. Oklahoma City controlled the early scoring, San Antonio gained momentum after halftime, and the Thunder answered the pressure to protect their lead.

Oklahoma City Thunder Player Stats

The Thunder received a balanced scoring effort from their starting lineup and reserves. Gilgeous Alexander led the team, but McCain’s outside shooting and Holmgren’s rim protection also played important roles.

PlayerPTSREBASTSTLBLKFG
Shai Gilgeous Alexander32643313/27
Jared McCain2022107/9
Chet Holmgren1472043/8
Jalen Williams1272115/16
Alex Caruso961103/4
Aday Mara721013/4
Cason Wallace632103/8
Jaylin Williams541001/6
Ajay Mitchell456002/8
Isaiah Hartenstein433112/4
Kenrich Williams320001/1

Source: NBA official box score. Statistics are from the October 20, 2026 game.

Shai Gilgeous Alexander Leads Oklahoma City

Gilgeous Alexander finished with 32 points, six rebounds, four assists, three steals, and three blocks. He shot 13 of 27 from the field, including three made three pointers, and added three free throws.

His scoring gave Oklahoma City a dependable option throughout the game. He could create shots against defenders, attack gaps in the defense, and keep the offense moving when San Antonio began to close the distance.

The three steals also helped the Thunder disrupt San Antonio’s possessions. His defensive contribution mattered alongside his scoring because the Spurs were trying to build momentum after the break.

Gilgeous Alexander did not need to carry the entire offense alone. McCain’s bench production and Holmgren’s work around the basket allowed Oklahoma City to spread the scoring load.

Jared McCain Provides a Major Bench Boost

McCain scored 20 points in just over 22 minutes. He made seven of nine field goal attempts and six of eight three pointers. That gave him a remarkable 75 percent success rate from beyond the arc.

His outside shooting was one of the biggest differences between the teams. Oklahoma City made 14 three pointers overall, while San Antonio made 10. McCain accounted for six of the Thunder’s makes from long range.

The guard also finished with two rebounds, two assists, and one steal. His scoring helped Oklahoma City maintain pressure even when the starters were resting.

McCain’s performance shows why bench scoring matters in a competitive NBA game. A reserve who can quickly convert open shots forces the opposing defense to pay attention to more than the starting lineup.

Chet Holmgren Protects the Rim

Holmgren recorded 14 points, seven rebounds, two assists, and four blocks. He made all eight of his free throw attempts and gave Oklahoma City a strong defensive presence near the basket.

His four blocks were especially valuable against a San Antonio team that wanted to attack the paint. Holmgren’s length made shots harder to finish and gave the Thunder another way to interrupt possessions without relying only on perimeter defense.

He did not have a high field goal percentage, making three of eight shots, but his free throw shooting helped him reach 14 points. His seven rebounds also contributed to Oklahoma City’s 47 rebound total.

Alex Caruso and the Supporting Cast

Caruso finished with nine points, six rebounds, one assist, and one steal. He made three of four field goal attempts and both of his three point shots. His efficient scoring gave the Thunder useful production without requiring many attempts.

Ajay Mitchell recorded six assists, the most among Oklahoma City players in this game. He added five rebounds and helped connect the team’s scoring options. Isaiah Hartenstein contributed four points, three rebounds, three assists, one steal, and one block.

Jalen Williams added 12 points and seven rebounds, although he shot five of 16 from the field. Cason Wallace scored six points, while Aday Mara and Jaylin Williams supplied additional frontcourt minutes.

Oklahoma City’s overall success came from the combination of star scoring, accurate three point shooting, defensive plays, and contributions from players outside the starting five.

San Antonio Spurs Player Stats

San Antonio Spurs Player Stats

San Antonio had several productive individual performances, led by Castle and supported by Dylan Harper and Victor Wembanyama. However, the team’s shooting percentages limited the impact of those contributions.

PlayerPTSREBASTSTLBLKFG
Stephon Castle2471009/21
Dylan Harper1875007/17
Victor Wembanyama12133161/13
Devin Vassell731002/8
David Jones Garcia200000/1
Ja’Kobi Gillespie200001/2
Maliq Brown001000/0
Tarris Reed Jr.000000/0

Source: NBA official box score. Players listed here are those shown in the official box score with recorded game participation.

Stephon Castle Leads the Spurs in Scoring

Castle led San Antonio with 24 points and seven rebounds. He made nine of 21 field goal attempts and five of 12 three point attempts, giving the Spurs a productive perimeter scoring option.

His five made three pointers were a bright spot for San Antonio. He showed that the Spurs could generate offense from outside, even as the team struggled to find consistent shooting across the full lineup.

Castle also contributed on the glass, finishing with seven rebounds. His scoring helped San Antonio stay competitive after the team fell behind early.

The main challenge was maintaining that production across four quarters. The Spurs scored only 44 points in the first half, leaving themselves with a significant deficit to overcome after the break.

Dylan Harper Adds 18 Points

Harper recorded 18 points, seven rebounds, and five assists. He shot seven of 17 from the field and made four of four free throws.

His five assists were important because San Antonio needed more than individual scoring to challenge Oklahoma City. Harper helped create opportunities for teammates and supported the team’s improved offensive performance after halftime.

The Spurs won the third quarter by eight points, and Harper’s scoring and playmaking were part of that response. Still, the early deficit meant San Antonio needed to sustain its improved play for longer.

Victor Wembanyama Delivers a Defensive Performance

Wembanyama finished with 12 points, 13 rebounds, three assists, one steal, and six blocks. His six blocks led both teams and highlighted his impact around the basket.

He also collected 13 rebounds, giving San Antonio a strong presence on the glass. Those numbers helped the Spurs compete in the paint and limit some of Oklahoma City’s inside opportunities.

The main issue was shooting. Wembanyama made only one of 13 field goal attempts and missed all four of his three point attempts. He made 10 of 12 free throws, which accounted for most of his scoring.

His defensive production was significant, but the Spurs needed more efficient offense to take advantage of his work on the other end. Against a team shooting above 45 percent from the field, missed shots made it harder for San Antonio to keep pace.

Devin Vassell and the Remaining Spurs

Vassell scored seven points, adding three rebounds and one assist. He made two of eight field goal attempts and one of four three pointers.

The remaining recorded contributors had limited scoring totals. David Jones Garcia and Ja’Kobi Gillespie each scored two points, while Maliq Brown recorded one assist. The official box score also lists several players as inactive or unavailable, so their absence should not be confused with a scoreless performance.

San Antonio’s strongest individual numbers came from Castle’s scoring, Harper’s all around contribution, and Wembanyama’s rebounding and shot blocking. A more efficient collective shooting night could have made those performances more impactful.

Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats Team Stats Comparison

The team numbers explain how Oklahoma City built its lead and why San Antonio’s comeback fell short.

StatisticThunderSpurs
Final score116104
Field goals made4336
Field goal attempts9593
Field goal percentage45.3%38.7%
Three pointers made1410
Three point attempts3137
Three point percentage45.2%27.0%
Free throws made1622
Free throw percentage80.0%88.0%
Total rebounds4745
Assists2421
Steals86
Blocks1011
Turnovers1113
Bench points4829

Source: NBA official game recap and box score.

Shooting Efficiency Gives Oklahoma City the Edge

The Thunder’s biggest statistical advantage came from field goal and three point shooting. Oklahoma City made 45.3 percent of its field goal attempts, compared with 38.7 percent for San Antonio.

The three point gap was even more important. The Thunder made 45.2 percent of their attempts from long range, while the Spurs converted only 27 percent. Oklahoma City also attempted six fewer threes but made four more.

That difference helped offset San Antonio’s advantages at the free throw line and in fast break scoring. The Spurs made 22 free throws to Oklahoma City’s 16, yet the Thunder still won comfortably because they converted more shots from the field.

Rebounding and Ball Security

Oklahoma City finished with 47 rebounds, narrowly ahead of San Antonio’s 45. The Thunder also recorded 24 assists compared with 21 for the Spurs, suggesting a slightly more productive overall passing performance.

Turnovers were another important factor. Oklahoma City committed 11, while San Antonio had 13. The difference was not enormous, but the Thunder did a better job protecting possessions.

San Antonio recorded 11 blocks to Oklahoma City’s 10, led by Wembanyama’s six. That defensive strength did not fully offset the shooting gap.

Bench Scoring Makes a Difference

Oklahoma City’s bench produced 48 points, compared with 29 from San Antonio’s reserves. McCain’s 20 points accounted for much of that advantage.

A productive bench can change the shape of a game because it keeps the offense moving when starters sit. In this matchup, the Thunder received efficient shooting and useful contributions from multiple reserves, helping them maintain their advantage.

San Antonio’s bench scoring was lower, which placed more pressure on its leading players to generate offense. That imbalance became harder to overcome after the Spurs fell behind in the first half.

Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats Quarter by Quarter Game Analysis

The scoring pattern explains how Oklahoma City built its lead and survived San Antonio’s strongest stretch. The Thunder did their best work before halftime, while the Spurs improved after the break.

First Quarter

Oklahoma City opened the game with 34 points, taking a 34 to 28 lead. San Antonio scored well enough to stay within reach, but the Thunder established control by making shots and putting pressure on the Spurs’ defense.

The six point gap was manageable for San Antonio. At that stage, the game remained competitive, and the Spurs had time to adjust their defensive coverage.

Second Quarter

The second quarter proved decisive. Oklahoma City scored 31 points and held San Antonio to just 16, extending the lead to 65 to 44 at halftime.

That 15 point difference in the quarter created a difficult situation for the home team. The Thunder entered the break with a 21 point advantage, giving them room to withstand a San Antonio run later in the game.

Third Quarter

San Antonio responded with its best offensive quarter, scoring 36 points against Oklahoma City’s 28. The Spurs attacked the basket more effectively and cut into the deficit.

However, the Thunder still led 93 to 80 at the end of the quarter. San Antonio had improved its position, but it needed another strong stretch to make the result uncertain.

Fourth Quarter

Oklahoma City scored 23 points in the final period, while San Antonio added 24. The Spurs continued to compete, but they could not make up the remaining 13 point deficit entering the quarter.

The Thunder’s early scoring advantage ultimately proved too large to overcome. Their ability to respond after the third quarter helped secure the road win.

Key Matchups That Shaped the Result Of Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats

Shai Gilgeous Alexander vs Stephon Castle

Gilgeous Alexander won the scoring comparison with 32 points against Castle’s 24. Both guards gave their teams a reliable perimeter scoring option, but the Thunder star also contributed three steals and three blocks.

Castle had an efficient stretch from three point range, making five shots from beyond the arc. However, Gilgeous Alexander’s higher overall scoring total helped Oklahoma City maintain an advantage.

Chet Holmgren vs Victor Wembanyama

Holmgren and Wembanyama offered different strengths in the frontcourt. Holmgren scored 14 points and recorded four blocks, while Wembanyama collected 13 rebounds and six blocks.

Wembanyama had the stronger rebounding and shot blocking totals, but Holmgren contributed more efficiently as a scorer. His perfect eight for eight performance at the free throw line also helped Oklahoma City.

Neither player dominated every category. The key difference was how their contributions fit into the overall team performance.

The Bench Battle

Oklahoma City’s 48 bench points compared with San Antonio’s 29 were a major factor in the final margin. McCain’s 20 points stood out, particularly because he made six three pointers.

That extra scoring allowed the Thunder to spread the offensive workload. San Antonio received useful contributions from its young players, but the overall bench production did not match Oklahoma City’s output.

What the Stats Reveal About Both Teams

The box score offers several lessons beyond the final score.

  1. Oklahoma City can score from multiple positions. Gilgeous Alexander led the way, but McCain, Holmgren, and Caruso also contributed. That variety made it harder for San Antonio to focus on one scorer.
  2. Three point accuracy mattered more than volume. The Spurs attempted more threes, but Oklahoma City made more of them. Better shot selection and conversion helped the Thunder build their lead.
  3. San Antonio showed resilience after halftime. The Spurs won the third quarter and reduced the deficit. Their response demonstrated that they could create offense even after a difficult first half.
  4. Defensive production alone was not enough. Wembanyama’s six blocks and the Spurs’ 11 team blocks were impressive, but missed shots limited their ability to turn defensive stops into a full comeback.
  5. The first half set the terms of the game. Oklahoma City’s 21 point halftime advantage gave the team a cushion. San Antonio improved, but it could not erase the early damage.

Final Takeaway Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats

The October 20 matchup was a useful example of how shooting efficiency and bench production can decide an NBA game. Oklahoma City defeated San Antonio 116 to 104 by combining Gilgeous Alexander’s 32 points with McCain’s 20 point contribution and strong defensive work from Holmgren.

San Antonio had its own standout performances. Castle led the Spurs with 24 points, Harper added 18, and Wembanyama recorded 13 rebounds and six blocks. The team’s third quarter response showed promise, but its 27 percent three point shooting made a sustained comeback difficult.

For readers tracking the thunder vs spurs match player stats, the biggest differences were Oklahoma City’s shooting accuracy, its 19 point bench advantage, and its ability to build a substantial lead before halftime. The Spurs competed harder after the break, but the Thunder did enough to leave San Antonio with a 12 point victory.

Frequently Asked Questions Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats

Who won the Thunder vs Spurs game on October 20, 2026?

The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the San Antonio Spurs 116 to 104 on October 20, 2026, at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio.

Who scored the most points in the game?

Shai Gilgeous Alexander led all players with 32 points for Oklahoma City. Stephon Castle led San Antonio with 24 points.

How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?

Wembanyama scored 12 points and added 13 rebounds, three assists, one steal, and six blocks.

How many points did Jared McCain score?

McCain scored 20 points off the bench. He made seven of nine field goal attempts, including six of eight three pointers.

Which team shot better from three point range?

Oklahoma City shot 45.2 percent from three point range, making 14 of 31 attempts. San Antonio shot 27 percent, making 10 of 37 attempts.

What was the halftime score?

Oklahoma City led San Antonio 65 to 44 at halftime after outscoring the Spurs 31 to 16 in the second quarter.

How many rebounds did each team record?

The Thunder recorded 47 rebounds, while the Spurs finished with 45.

Where can I find the complete player box score?

You can review the official NBA box score for player minutes, field goal attempts, three pointers, free throws, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, and plus minus statistics.

1 thought on “Thunder vs Spurs Match Player Stats and Game Recap 2026”

Leave a Comment